Clients & Grants

Consulting Clients

Our sustained and emerging impacts evaluation clients include:

* American Red CrossTransition, Graduation and Sustainability Planning” (2018-19)

* Terre des Hommes Italia“Exit and Sustainability Planning for Jukta Hoe Mukta’ in Bangladesh” (2018-19)

* Lutheran World Relief, Tanzania Agricultural Value Chain “ex-post” project evaluation (2018)

*USAID via Management Systems International in Ugandan Evaluation of Sustained Outcomes (2018)- primary education, 15 years “ex–post” project systems evaluation. Synthesis Report across the four SOBE cases.

Catholic Relief Services Zimbabwe (2016), 2 years Rehabilitation/ Livelihoods “ex–post” project Sustained and Emerging Impacts evaluation

* Catholic Relief Services, in Niger (2015) 3 years Food Security (Agriculture/ Health) “ex–post” Sustained and Emerging Impacts project evaluation

* The Federation of the Red Cross/ Red Crescent projected sustainability in Ethiopia (2014), at final Food Security evaluation, designing community sustainability monitoring

* Lutheran World Relief/ Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation projected sustainability in Niger (2006),  6 months “ex–post” project drought rehabilitation evaluation

Our other international development and monitoring & evaluation clients include:

  • The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Aga Khan Foundation
  • US Agency for International Development (USAID)
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • CARE
  • Save the Children
  • World Vision
  • Mercy Corps
  • Geneva Global
  • Global Giving

We have also worked with Salomon Brothers, Price Waterhouse and Coopers & Lybrand as well as with other clients.

Research Grants

Valuing Voices received a Faster Forward Fund research grant for sustained impact evaluation by expert evaluator Michael Scriven through the Marin Community Foundation (2017).

A review of eight projects with end-of-project and post project evaluation reports suggest that post project evaluations can contribute to better understanding of the sustainability of project impacts and identify unexpected and emerging outcomes years after project close.

The review highlights some of the methodological issues that are unique to post project (as opposed to end of project) evaluation, and point to the advantages of planning for sustainability measurement from the outset of the project. If not, what planning is needed at project end

Organizations that fund post project evaluations offer a range of reasons for doing so: to learn, to promote a success, to inform replication or scale, to provide justification for future funding, to promote accountability.

 

Additional Woman-Owned Small Business in the USA Information:

D&B #: 017447821

NAICS codes:
541720 – Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
541618 – Other Management Consulting Services
541611 – Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
541620 – Environmental Consulting Services
541690 – Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Translate »